Usually I don't even look at the price of a device until I know how good it is, then I start considering, whether it is worth it. So a bit more bulk might be ok, it also saves you from fiddeling with the mechanism. On the other side, you wouldn't get any of those cameras for their size today.
The camera definitely looks nice though its ancestors were definitely easier to carry thanks to their folding capacity. Nikon AI and AI-P lenses had this ideology, but surely that didn't survive.Īs my farther had and used a polaroid camera, seeing this announcement made me curious.
#Polaroid spectra film manual
On similar lines, we have auto focus and manual focus, 2 extremes why not a middle ground, assisted focus ?. I need a camera that doesn't run out of juice, and has zero lag, for that once in a lifetime shot. I can't help but draw parallels to programming but I'll refrain from doing so.īeing at the right place at the right time, perhaps takes a week of backcountry hiking, so be it. Sure this will add a bit of weight and all that, but this will appeal to those photographers who love the process, and believe that the end result takes care of itself. In fact, I wouldn't even mind having film as a backup, in case the battery runs out. So cut everything out of the camera that sucks battery - the LCD screen, the motors, just have the sharpest lens and the best sensor, bring back the optical viewfinder. I want the freedom of my own digital darkroom but I need a fully manual and digital camera with an incredible 4-6 month battery life. What won over digital is not just the freedom to click a million pictures, but the freedom to run your own darkroom on your PC/Mac. The hassle of developing film was too much even in the US. Heck, I even bought a medium format camera. I was an ardent manual film photography fan. If you, we, I, want film photography to thrive and be more than a dead language, we will really need it to do things that digital can't, apart from being slow, expensive and crap in the eyes of many. So there were things that digital can't easily do now that film could do, but without the film, that value prop has gone, and film cameras versatility has gone with it. Kodachrome? Yes, what speed would you like? Infrared film? Colour or Black and White? I have a Kodak reference manual/catalogue here from the mid-1990s and the variety and versatility of film is something to behold.
#Polaroid spectra film plus
Plus the variety and diversity of film photography has narrowed considerably. Running costs are very high, for processing and scanning or printing, and where digital had high upfront costs initially for computers, everyone already has those now anyway. And plenty of unreliable, hard-to-repair cameras are also fetching silly money.īUT - the value prop has totally changed. I don't think manual focus SLRs (If that's what you mean) are going anywhere now, there's widespread popularity for film photography and the "better" cameras (mechanical or reliable) are fetching silly money. " You know, something consumerist and literally disposable, like a polaroid. The real problem is that Apple is so painfully apolitical, social media photography on iPhones is the layperson equivalent of crapstraction, so they'll never deliver something advertises that it's for "getting the shot," they'll stick to advertising that it's for "getting the shot.
But if they lived today, they'd use a D700 and an ultrawide, a DSLR composes a lot better than an LCD screen or an EVF and sensor technology has practically peaked in 2014 ( ).
#Polaroid spectra film how to
If you're going to be a heritage brand, you ought to think how to equip the greats, the Weegees and the Diane Arbuses, who could surely make interesting stuff with a Polaroid. Of course they didn't show me a Andy Warhol, but then again, they probably don't have the rights to do that. They are missing a lot of opportunities with the heritage. I'm surprised they didn't do Elsa Dorfman. It feels like social media adjacent stuff without being so low brow. And Land was actual scientist, he made meaningful technologies for WW2, he's practically a war hero, and yet, who the fuck knows who he is outside of Walter Isaacson readers? Dieter Rams (another Jobsian figure) doesn't figure much better, but nothing he ever designed was as big as the SX70, as brilliant as he was. His Wikipedia page: a pathetic 3,000 words. who wants to carry around a brick?Įdwin Land was the Steve Jobs of that era, the SX70 was the iPod of that era.
0 kommentar(er)
